A SECRET WEAPON FOR LEADING CASE LAWS OF TAX PRACTICES SEC 122 5 A

A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a

A Secret Weapon For leading case laws of tax practices sec 122 5 a

Blog Article

seventy seven . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 on the Constitution based to the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued into the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

one zero one . H.C.A 203/2016 (D.B.) Saleh Muhammad V/S Faqir Muhammad & others Sindh High Court, Karachi Topic: Appeal At times it can be hassle-free for just a Judge to dismiss the suit for non-prosecution, however, a Judge is under the obligation to generate an attempt to dispose of a case on advantage and more importantly when after recording of evidence it has reached into a stage of final arguments, endeavors should be made for merit disposal when it's arrived at these stage. Read more

This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the way inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the method of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached with the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If the conclusion or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever attained, the Court might interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mildew the relief to make it appropriate to your facts of each and every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is definitely the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or maybe the nature of punishment. Around the aforesaid proposition, we're fortified because of the decision from the Supreme Court inside the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

Section 302 on the Pakistan Penal Code addresses the grave offense of intentional murder and prescribes severe punishments to work as a deterrent and copyright the value of human life. The application from the death penalty or life imprisonment depends about the specifics of every case, which includes any extenuating circumstances or mitigating factors.

These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to this sort of past decisions, drawing on set up judicial authority to formulate their positions.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو website کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

Following the decision, NESPAK, as directed, conducted an assessment from the grid project and submitted that sufficient mitigation measures were in place to render any prospective adverse impacts negligible. Based on this, the grid station was permitted being built.

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to the Judgment within time. Read more

Online access to the case management system for the Court of Appeals of Virginia. Cases may be searched using name or case number.

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a close-by electricity grid station because of possible health risks and dangers.

 Criminal cases Inside the common regulation tradition, courts decide the law applicable into a case by interpreting statutes and applying precedents which record how and why prior cases have been decided. Compared with most civil regulation systems, common law systems Stick to the doctrine of stare decisis, by which most courts are bound by their individual previous decisions in similar cases. According to stare decisis, all lower courts should make decisions dependable with the previous decisions of higher courts.

1. Judicial Independence: The court emphasised the importance of judicial independence as well as separation of powers.

                                                        

Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual length of service just about violates the whole service framework to be a civil servant inducted in Grade seventeen by claiming these types of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention with the legislation nor with the equity. Read more

Report this page